Instead, the court embraced the idea that the law is targeted at TikTok and its Chinese-based parent company, ByteDance, through the divestiture provision.

Of particular note during those arguments was Chief Justice John Roberts, who repeatedly suggested that the court might consider revisiting precedents protecting obscenity online.

(CNN) — The Supreme Court’s remarkably speedy decision Friday to allow a controversial ban on TikTok to take hold will have a dramatic impact on the tens of millions of Americans who visit the app ...

It is tradition to use a Bible during presidential inaugurations, although not required by the U.S. Constitution. George Washington began the practice in 1789, and most presidents have followed ...

BEIJING (Reuters) - ByteDance, the Chinese owner of TikTok, has earmarked over 150 billion yuan ($20.64 billion) in capital ...

After the family of Grayson Roberts, a Southern California boy who is blind due to a rare eye condition, lost their home in the Eaton Fire, community members are coming together to support them. The ...

It’s easy to despise Elon Musk as a supremely loathsome power-mad egomaniac. But he’s also the richest man in the world, and he got that way by immigrating to the United States and seizing the ...